Migration publications & guidances

Indicator ID M2
Indicator full statement

# and type of (academic and non-academic) publications, guidance and learning modules [on migration topics] in which Tdh is in a leadership or active contribution position .

Purpose

Importance

This indicator aims to measure the capacity of Tdh to produce knowledge and learning content on migration and migration programming. As per the intervention strategy, Tdh aims to become a place of expertise on migration. This indicator aims to assess progress made to build this expertise, year per year.

ToC pathway

Toc pathway 1 – Information/ prevention of risks.

Related services

Catalogue of services: production of specific information and knowledge on children and youth in migration, e-learning.

Definition

How to collect & analyse the data

What do we count?

Tdh counts formalized pieces of writing. 

Examples:  

- https://tdh-test.edunao.com/course/view.php?id=34&lang=en_wp   

- Quality_of_CYM_services.pdf 

How to calculate the indicator's value

This is the sum of all pieces of writing recorded over the year from 1st of January to 31st of December.

Data sources

Studies, publications, project data, online modules, activity reports.

Data collection methods and tools

Ongoing collection according to the publication of these documents.

This indicator is to be collected at national, regional, and global level.

Disaggregation

Type of pieces: publication, guidance, learning module.

Limitations and precautions

  • Internal Tdh guidance that do not aim to strengthen capacities on migration are not to be counted. For any advice, reach your Migration Regional coordinator! 

  • This indicator reflects the output level: a production of writing contribution. It does not measure any change at outcome level (policy, knowledge).  It must be used with corresponding outcome level indicators (see indicators M1, M3, M8) to reflect on Tdh contribution to wider-longer term practice and knowledge changes. 

  • Strategy of dissemination coming with the publication is highly recommended. 

What further analysis are we interested in?

  • Provide qualitative insights on type of publications and guidance that were produced: topics of the papers, who was reached, effect of dissemination, etc.  

  • To which degree this material has been co-created with CYM and / or communities?  

  • How is this material disseminated? Is there any strategy of dissemination?  

  • Any additional feedback you may have collected on these pieces of work are welcome. 

Additional guidance

MoA structure available on the Knowledge Center Migration.

This guidance was prepared by Tdh ©
Propose Improvements