| Indicator ID | M10 |
|---|---|
| Indicator full statement | # of national and local actors committed in advocacy actions on child rights in context of mobility, supported by Tdh. |
Purpose
| Importance | This indicator aims to indicate the number of partners supported by Tdh in advocacy actions. |
|---|---|
| ToC pathway | ToC pathway 4 – Promotion of rights. |
| Related services | Catalogue of services: advocacy and public communication. |
Definition
National and local actors: civil society organisations, youth movements, local authorities, governments, unions, etc.
Advocacy actions: campaigns, lobbying initiatives, public / conference meetings, statements, open letter, policy recommendations.
Thanks to Tdh: with the support of Tdh, or invited by Tdh, or co-organised with Tdh.
How to collect & analyse the data
| What do we count? | Tdh count entities (organizations). |
|---|---|
| How to calculate the indicator's value | This is the sum of national and local actors that have been part to advocacy actions, thanks to Tdh. Ex: Tdh is organizing a conference to address child ‘rights violations in cross-borders context and the local organisation we are working with in this area is invited to participate to a roundtable and share recommendations. |
| Data sources | Activity report, Project data, campaign reports, materials. |
| Data collection methods and tools | When an advocacy action is collected (see P.20), count the number of local partner organisations that has been actively participating thanks to Tdh. Ongoing collection according to the organisation / participation of the events. Use Advocacy tracker to share updates on your events! |
| Disaggregation | Level of change : local, national, regional, global. . Please, disaggregate the data by the type of partners (civil society actor, government actor, local authorities). |
Limitations and precautions
Do not count people but “entities” – organizations.
This indicator is fully linked to P.20. P.20 count the advocacy actions, P.21 focuses on the actors who are part of these advocacy actions.
Local actors who participate to a public advocacy action without any kind of partnership or support from Tdh should not be counted.
Provide qualitative insights on good and bad practices (what works and does not work when working with local partners).
What further analysis are we interested in?
This indicator sheds light on the degree of localisation of the actions carried out. Tdh is interested here in analysing several dimensions of localisation (NEAR Framework): do we progress in terms of visibility of local actors, advocacy shared with local actors, participation of beneficiaries.
Additional guidance
NEAR Framework : Microsoft Word - LMPF Final 2019 (squarespace.com)